Install payload
Install payload is broadly covered in current results.
83% (10/12)
1 trusted · 41 review · 2 limited in this set — compare to see which signals differ.
Trust signals across 40 of 44 results
3 trust signals differ in this sample: Package trust, Source provenance, Submitter
Signals differ on Package trust, Source provenance, Submitter — add entries to compare before you install.
Rollout signal scan
Biggest gaps: metadata review, package integrity. 0 entries have 2+ required gaps.
Install payload
Install payload is broadly covered in current results.
83% (10/12)
Most at-risk entries in this view
Adoption queue
9/44 visible results are in hold tier and need mitigation before adoption.
1 blockers: Metadata review
70/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack · trust trusted · confidence 83%
1 blockers: Metadata review
50/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.
commands/pr-security-review · trust review · confidence 67%
1 blockers: Metadata review
50/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.
commands/review · trust review · confidence 67%
1 blockers: Metadata review
50/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.
skills/addy-osmani-agent-skills · trust review · confidence 67%
1 blockers: Metadata review
50/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.
rules/ai-generated-csrf-protection-review-rules · trust review · confidence 67%
1 blockers: Metadata review
50/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.
rules/ai-generated-frontend-accessibility-review-rules · trust review · confidence 67%
1 blockers: Metadata review
50/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.
rules/ai-generated-idor-review-rules · trust review · confidence 67%
1 blockers: Metadata review
50/100
Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.
Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.
rules/ai-generated-insecure-deserialization-review-rules · trust review · confidence 67%
Decision confidence
7/44 results are low-confidence and need review before adoption.
Confident candidate for staged adoption.
74/100
skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack · trust trusted
Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.
54/100
commands/pr-security-review · trust review
Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.
54/100
commands/review · trust review
Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.
54/100
skills/addy-osmani-agent-skills · trust review
Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.
54/100
rules/ai-generated-csrf-protection-review-rules · trust review
Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.
54/100
rules/ai-generated-frontend-accessibility-review-rules · trust review
Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.
54/100
rules/ai-generated-idor-review-rules · trust review
Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.
54/100
rules/ai-generated-insecure-deserialization-review-rules · trust review
Freshness distribution
Median age 54 days; 9 fresh, 3 aging or stale of 12 scanned.
Oldest entries in this view
Theme distribution
100% of this view shares the top theme. Leading themes: code-review, ai-generated-code, security.
75 distinct themes across 24 scanned
Run Claude Code ultrareview with /code-review ultra for multi-agent cloud review, verified findings, PR mode, and optional claude ultrareview CI subcommand.
Expert code reviewer that provides thorough, constructive feedback on code quality, security, performance, and best practices
Comprehensive code review rules for thorough analysis and constructive feedback
Expert code-review capability pack for deterministic PR audits, risk-ranked findings, and low-noise fix planning without SaaS lock-in.
Addy Osmani's production-grade Agent Skills pack for AI coding agents, with lifecycle slash commands, engineering workflow skills, review personas, quality gates, and cross-agent setup guidance for Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Antigravity CLI, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and other agents.
MIT-licensed skill and plugin framework by Jesse Vincent for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, and other AI coding agents, covering brainstorming, planning, TDD, systematic debugging, subagent-driven development, code review, git worktrees, and finish-the-branch workflows.
Slash command that reviews a pull request diff for security regressions: authentication and authorization gaps, injection surfaces, secret exposure, unsafe deserialization, and dependency risk introduced by the change.
Local codebase intelligence CLI and MCP server that gives Claude a SQLite code graph, change-safety gates, code health checks, impact analysis, review tools, and audit evidence for agent-assisted coding.
Provider Abstraction Layer MCP server for orchestrating multiple AI models, external AI CLIs, planning, consensus, code review, debugging, and delegated sub-agent workflows from one MCP client.
PostToolUse hook that flags two review hazards as Claude writes files: edits to generated or vendored artifacts (lockfiles, minified bundles, source maps, dist/build output, snapshots, protobuf output) and oversized diffs that change more lines than a configurable threshold versus the committed version.
Open-source secret scanner for finding passwords, API keys, tokens, and other credentials in git history, files, directories, and stdin.
Static analysis platform and open-source CLI for finding bugs, security issues, secrets, dependency risk, and custom rule matches in code.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated endpoints and data-access code before merge for insecure direct object reference risk, covering per-request object-level authorization checks, scoped database lookups, identifier exposure, and consistent enforcement across read, write, and admin operations.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that deserializes data before merge for insecure deserialization risk, covering native serialization formats (pickle, PyYAML, Java Serializable) that can execute arbitrary code on untrusted input, safe data-interchange alternatives, and class allowlisting/integrity checks when native formats can't be avoided.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that binds request parameters to model/entity objects before merge for mass assignment risk, covering allowlist field binding, DTOs that exclude sensitive fields, and the framework-specific autobinding features that make this easy to introduce by default.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated redirect and forward logic before merge for open redirect risk, covering allowlist-based destination validation, relative-path/indexed-mapping alternatives to raw URLs, and the privilege-escalation and phishing impact of an unvalidated redirect target.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that builds or runs operating-system commands, shell invocations, or subprocesses before merge for command injection and argument injection risk, covering library alternatives to shelling out, array-form process APIs, allowlist input validation, and least-privilege execution.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated JavaScript/TypeScript code before merge for prototype pollution risk, covering unsafe recursive merge/clone/assign helpers on untrusted input, proto and constructor-prototype key handling, and safer alternatives like Map, Set, and Object.create(null).
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that renders untrusted data into HTML, JavaScript, URLs, or CSS before merge for cross-site scripting risk, covering context-correct output encoding, dangerous DOM sinks, HTML sanitization, and Content-Security-Policy as defense in depth.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated request handlers and forms before merge for cross-site request forgery risk, covering state-changing method discipline, anti-CSRF token correctness, SameSite cookie posture, origin and referer checks, and safe handling of cookie-based sessions.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated file-handling code for path traversal before merge, covering canonical path validation, safe root confinement, upload filename sanitization, archive extraction limits, and privacy-safe test evidence.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated regular expressions before merge, covering catastrophic backtracking and ReDoS risk, input bounds, anchor and escaping correctness, validation versus parsing, safe engines, and privacy-safe test evidence.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated database access code for SQL injection before merge, covering parameterized queries, identifier handling, ORM safety, dynamic query construction, least-privilege access, and privacy-safe test evidence.
Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that makes server-side URL or network requests for server-side request forgery before merge, covering URL allow-lists, block-lists for internal networks, redirect handling, response isolation, and privacy-safe test evidence.
Source-backed rules for reviewing event-sourcing implementation changes, covering immutable event design, event schema evolution without breaking projections, idempotent event handlers, snapshot and replay correctness, and consistent event-store access patterns.
Source-backed rules for reviewing feature flag changes across their full lifecycle, covering flag creation, naming, default values, kill switches, targeting, rollout safety, cleanup of stale flags, and privacy-safe configuration evidence.
Source-backed rules for reviewing application logging changes, covering structured machine-readable events, consistent levels, correlation and trace context, actionable messages, log volume and cost, and keeping secrets and personal data out of logs.
Source-backed rules for reviewing test code for test-double misuse, covering over-mocking that decouples tests from real behavior, under-mocking that creates slow or flaky tests, mock-return-value drift, missing contract tests for faked dependencies, and keeping test data free of personal information.
Source-backed rules for reviewing code that calls third-party or remote APIs, covering timeouts, bounded retries with backoff and jitter, idempotency, circuit breaking, rate-limit handling, graceful degradation, and privacy-safe failure logging.
Set up Claude Code GitHub Actions for pull request review: install the Claude GitHub app, store ANTHROPIC_API_KEY in secrets, pin anthropics/claude-code-action to an audited commit SHA with least-privilege permissions, and follow documented security practices.