Skip to main content
hc
Submit
skillsFirst-partyReview first Safety ✓ Privacy ✓

Code Review Automation Capability Pack Skill

Expert code-review capability pack for deterministic PR audits, risk-ranked findings, and low-noise fix planning without SaaS lock-in.

by JSONbored·added 2026-04-11·
Claude CodeCodexWindsurfGeminiCursorCLI
HarnessClaude CodeCodexWindsurfGeminiCursorCLI
Level:expertType:capability-packVerified:validated
Review first — review before installing

Open the source and read safety notes before installing.

Citation facts

Source-backed facts for citing this resource, derived directly from the registry — also available as plain text for AI assistants.

Canonical URL
https://heyclau.de/entry/skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack
Source URLs
https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews, https://github.com/JSONbored/awesome-claude/blob/main/content/skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack.mdx
Package URL
/downloads/skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack.zip
Package SHA256
5e2a8567d4a88913443a4a9e76823180775eb767e51770c0a3c8ca5e39ffe59b
Safety notes
Installs from a downloaded package and may run local commands or scaffold files as part of the workflow; review the package and any generated changes before applying.
Privacy notes
Operates on your local project files and any context you share in the session; review what you expose before sharing — nothing is sent beyond the model unless a step calls an external service.
Platform compatibility
claude-code (native-skill), codex (native-skill), windsurf (native-skill), gemini (native-skill), cursor (adapter), cli (manual-context)
Author
JSONbored
Claim status
unclaimed
Last verified
2026-04-11

Decision playbook

Ready to evaluate for your workflow

Signals are comparatively strong, but you should still validate source, privacy posture, and package provenance for your environment.

Compare context
Selected

0

Current score

96

Baseline

—

Delta

No baseline selected

No major trust-signal divergence detected in the current selection.

Source and provenance checks

Complete

Confirm ownership and provenance before trusting install instructions.

  • Source link availableRequired

    Open the canonical repository and verify ownership.

    Done

  • Source provenance statusRequired

    Marked as first-party.

    Done

  • Metadata reviewed

    Registry metadata indicates a reviewed listing.

    Done

Safety and privacy checks

Complete

Validate risk disclosures before installation or API wiring.

  • Safety notes presentRequired

    Review the listed safety guidance before running commands.

    Done

  • Privacy notes presentRequired

    Review data handling notes before connecting accounts or secrets.

    Done

  • Trust level risk gateRequired

    Trust level does not block evaluation.

    Done

Package and install checks

Complete

Check package metadata and artifact integrity signals.

  • Install payload available

    Install or copy payload is available for review.

    Done

  • Package verification flag

    Package marked verified.

    Done

  • Checksum metadata

    SHA-256 hash is present.

    Done

Compare-driven decision checks

Needs review

Use compare context to validate trade-offs before adoption.

  • Compare tray has multiple entries

    Add at least one more entry to compare trust differences.

    Pending

  • Baseline comparison available

    No baseline peer selected yet.

    Pending

  • Diverging trust signals identified

    No major trust-signal divergence found.

    Pending

Setup at a glance

Package install

Copy-ready — paste the snippet to get started.

Install command

Provided

Config snippet

Not provided

Copy snippet

Provided

Prerequisites

3 to clear

Platforms

6 listed

Difficulty

88/100

Adoption plan

Balanced adoption plan

Current risk score 0/100. Use staged verification before broader rollout.

Risk 0

Pre-adoption checks

Validate source and review signals before any execution.

  • Confirm source provenanceRequired

    Source URL/provenance metadata is present.

    Done

  • Confirm metadata review state

    Listing has review metadata.

    Done

  • Verify install payload

    Install/config payload exists and can be inspected.

    Done

Security checks

Confirm safety, privacy, and package integrity signals.

  • Review safety notesRequired

    Safety notes are present.

    Done

  • Review privacy notesRequired

    Privacy notes are present.

    Done

  • Verify package integrity metadata

    Package verification/checksum metadata is available.

    Done

Rollout

Adopt in controlled steps based on the selected plan.

  • Run in isolated sandbox firstRequired

    Use a constrained sandbox and observe behavior across multiple tasks.

    Pending

  • Roll out graduallyRequired

    Roll out to a small cohort before wider usage.

    Pending

  • Set monitoring and fallback

    Define rollback path and monitor errors after adoption.

    Pending

Evidence readiness

Evidence readiness matrix · balanced

Required evidence gates are covered (6/6 signals complete).

Risk 0

Source provenance

Present

Source repository/provenance is listed.

Required in this preset

Metadata review

Present

Review metadata is present.

Required in this preset

Safety notes

Present

Safety notes are present.

Required in this preset

Privacy notes

Present

Privacy notes are present.

Optional in this preset

Package integrity

Present

Package integrity metadata is present.

Optional in this preset

Install payload

Present

Install payload is available.

Required in this preset

Required evidence gates are covered for this preset.

Decision timeline

Decision timeline · balanced

6/6 steps complete with no blocking gaps for this preset.

Risk 0

triage

Confirm source provenanceRequired

Source/provenance metadata is available.

Done

triage

Check metadata review statusRequired

Review metadata is available.

Done

verify

Review safety notesRequired

Safety notes are available.

Done

verify

Review privacy notes

Privacy notes are available.

Done

verify

Validate package integrity metadata

Package integrity metadata is available.

Done

rollout

Verify install payload and commandsRequired

Install payload is available.

Done

No required blockers for this timeline preset.

Prerequisite readiness

Prerequisite readiness

3 prerequisites to line up before setup.

0/3 ready
General3

Safety & privacy surface

Safety & privacy surface

1 safety and 1 privacy notes across 2 risk areas. Review closely: credentials & tokens, network access.

2 areas
  • SafetyNetwork accessInstalls from a downloaded package and may run local commands or scaffold files as part of the workflow; review the package and any generated changes before applying.
  • PrivacyCredentials & tokensOperates on your local project files and any context you share in the session; review what you expose before sharing — nothing is sent beyond the model unless a step calls an external service.

Safety notes

  • Installs from a downloaded package and may run local commands or scaffold files as part of the workflow; review the package and any generated changes before applying.

Privacy notes

  • Operates on your local project files and any context you share in the session; review what you expose before sharing — nothing is sent beyond the model unless a step calls an external service.

Prerequisites

  • Repository access and PR diff
  • Security severity policy
  • Test/lint/typecheck commands

Schema details

Install type
package
Reading time
9 min
Difficulty score
88
Troubleshooting
Yes
Breaking changes
No
Package metadata
Package verified
Yes
SHA-256
5e2a8567d4a88913443a4a9e76823180775eb767e51770c0a3c8ca5e39ffe59b
Skill and platform metadata
Skill type
capability-pack
Skill level
expert
Verification
validated
Verified at
2026-04-11
Retrieval sources
https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requestshttps://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/
Tested platforms
ClaudeCodexOpenClawCursorWindsurfGemini
PlatformSupportInstall path
claude-codeNative.claude/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
codexNative.agents/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
windsurfNative.windsurf/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
geminiNative.gemini/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md or .agents/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
cursorAdapter.cursor/rules/<skill-name>.mdc
cliManualAGENTS.md or tool-specific context file
Full copyable content
# Trigger
"Apply the code review automation capability pack to this PR."

# Required output
1) Risk-ranked findings (P0-P3) with evidence
2) Exploitability notes and blast-radius estimate
3) Minimal patch plan grouped by file ownership
4) Post-fix validation checklist

About this resource

Knowledge Freshness

This capability pack is pinned to documentation verified on 2026-04-11. Refresh references before using this skill for critical production decisions.

Retrieval Sources

Core Workflow

  1. Build threat model from changed files and data boundaries.
  2. Classify findings by exploitability and operational impact.
  3. Remove low-confidence noise before presenting blockers.
  4. Produce minimal, file-scoped patch plan with validation gates.
  5. Re-check changed attack surfaces after fixes land.

Overview

This skill teaches agents to perform fast, low-noise code reviews that mimic senior reviewer behavior: clear severity, concrete evidence, and fix-first recommendations.

Capability Scope

  • PR diff triage and risk scoring
  • Security and reliability regression detection
  • False-positive suppression rules
  • Patch-plan generation with owner mapping
  • Post-fix verification guidance

Compatibility

Native

  • Claude Code / Claude: native skill usage via SKILL.md.
  • Codex/OpenAI workflows: compatible with Agent Skills-style SKILL.md content as reusable workflow instructions.

Manual Adaptation

  • Gemini CLI: native skill usage via .gemini/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md or .agents/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md where supported.
  • Cursor: use the generated .cursor/rules/*.mdc adapter for project rules.
  • OpenClaw and similar agents: use the same skill content as a reusable prompt/workflow file when native skill import is unavailable.

Production Rules

  • Do not block merges on low-confidence findings.
  • Require concrete code evidence for every high-severity claim.
  • Separate exploitability from style concerns.
  • Always include rollback or quick-mitigation options.

Troubleshooting

Issue: Too many low-signal findings
Fix: tighten rule set to changed files and critical paths first.

Issue: Security findings lack proof
Fix: require request/response, data-flow, or control-path evidence.

Issue: Patch plan is too broad
Fix: break by file ownership and dependency boundary.

Output Contract

  1. Risk-ranked findings with direct evidence.
  2. Priority fix plan with smallest safe diff.
  3. Validation commands and pass criteria.
  4. Remaining residual risks and follow-ups.

Validation Checklist

  • Confirm findings map to changed code.
  • Run test/lint/typecheck after patch.
  • Re-check auth, input validation, and data handling paths.
  • Verify no new critical findings introduced by fixes.
#code-review#pull-requests#security#capability-pack#automation

Source citations

Add this badge to your README

Show that Code Review Automation Capability Pack Skill is listed on HeyClaude. Paste this Markdown into your README — it renders the badge and links back to this page.

Listed on HeyClaude
[![Listed on HeyClaude](https://heyclau.de/badge/skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack.svg)](https://heyclau.de/entry/skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack)

How it compares

Code Review Automation Capability Pack Skill side by side with its closest alternative on trust, install, platform support, and disclosed safety notes — all from reviewed registry metadata.

3 trust signals differ across this comparison (Package trust, Source provenance, Submitter).

Next steps differ across entries — use the actions in the table below to copy install commands and source links per resource.

Field
Code Review Automation Capability Pack Skill

Expert code-review capability pack for deterministic PR audits, risk-ranked findings, and low-noise fix planning without SaaS lock-in.

Open dossier
Pull Request Triage Capability Pack Skill

Expert maintainer pull request triage capability pack for classifying open PRs, applying labels, routing reviewers, checking merge readiness, and producing privacy-safe queue summaries using GitHub pull request documentation workflows.

Open dossier
Next stepsDiffers
Open dossierAPI JSONOpen LLMOpen sourceNewsletterClaim listing
Open dossierAPI JSONOpen LLMOpen sourceNewsletterClaim listing
Trust
Review statusReviewedMaintainer reviewedReviewedMaintainer reviewed
Package trustDiffersPackage verified2026-04-11Package not verified
Source provenanceDiffersSource-backedSubmission linkedSource submission
SubmitterDiffers—kiannidev
Install riskReview firstReview first
Notes Safety ✓ Privacy ✓ Safety ✓ Privacy ✓
Brand——
Categoryskillsskills
Sourcefirst-partysource-backed
AuthorJSONboredkiannidev
Added2026-04-112026-06-15
Platforms
Claude CodeCodexWindsurfGeminiCursorCLI
Claude CodeCodexWindsurfGeminiCursorCLI
Source repo——
Safety notes✓Installs from a downloaded package and may run local commands or scaffold files as part of the workflow; review the package and any generated changes before applying.✓Treat label changes, reviewer requests, milestone moves, and merge approvals as governance actions requiring maintainer approval. Do not merge or close pull requests from triage output alone unless explicit automation policy exists. Escalate suspected security, license, or conduct issues to private maintainer channels instead of public PR threads. Rate-limit bulk triage actions to avoid notification storms for contributors and reviewers.
Privacy notes✓Operates on your local project files and any context you share in the session; review what you expose before sharing — nothing is sent beyond the model unless a step calls an external service.✓Pull request diffs and comments can contain proprietary code, customer examples, tokens, and internal URLs. Queue summaries for shared channels should use PR numbers, labels, and blocker types—not pasted diffs or secrets. Contributor identities and employer hints in PR descriptions may be sensitive; avoid unnecessary quoting in public notes. Exported triage reports should follow repository data-retention and contributor privacy policies.
Prerequisites
  • Repository access and PR diff
  • Security severity policy
  • Test/lint/typecheck commands
  • Open pull request queue or filtered PR list with repository contribution and review policies.
  • Current label taxonomy, CODEOWNERS rules, required checks, and maintainer ownership map.
  • Permission scope stated up front: read-only recommendations versus approved label or assignment edits.
  • Access to linked issues, CI status, release milestones, and security disclosure policy when routing.
Install
curl -L https://heyclau.de/downloads/skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack.zip -o coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack.zip && unzip -o coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack.zip -d ./coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack
—
Config——
Citations
ClaimUnclaimedUnclaimed
Open in the interactive comparison tool

Related guides

Source-backed guides for putting this to work.

guides

Review AI-Generated Code Before Merge

Review AI-generated pull requests with repeatable security, test, and evidence checks.

Review firstSource-backedReview firstAdded 1mo ago
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓by MkDev11
guides

Auto Mode Hard-Deny Policies For Safe Automation

Set autoMode.hard_deny rules to block risky actions in auto mode.

Review firstSource-backedReview firstAdded 1mo ago
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓by kiannidev
GitHub logoguides

Claude Code GitHub Actions Review Workflow

Automate PR review with Claude Code GitHub Actions using official setup steps.

Review firstSource-backedReview firstAdded 28d ago
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓by kiannidev

Signals

Loading live community signals…

More like this, weekly

A short, calm digest of reviewed Claude resources. Unsubscribe any time.