Skip to main content

Browse the directory

Showing 30 of 40 resources for "code-review"
Saved
Active

1 trusted · 37 review · 2 limited in this set — compare to see which signals differ.

Trust snapshot

40 results in this view

Claimed
0%(0/40)

3 trust signals differ in this sample: Package trust, Source provenance, Submitter

Signals differ on Package trust, Source provenance, Submitter — add entries to compare before you install.

Rollout signal scan

2 rollout risk signals in current results

Biggest gaps: metadata review, package integrity. 0 entries have 2+ required gaps.

12 scanned

Install payload

Install payload is broadly covered in current results.

good

83% (10/12)

Adoption queue

Browse adoption queue · balanced

5/40 visible results are in hold tier and need mitigation before adoption.

ready 0caution 35hold 5
caution

70/100

Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.

skills/coderabbit-lite-pr-review-capability-pack · trust trusted · confidence 83%

caution

50/100

Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.

Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.

commands/review · trust review · confidence 67%

Addy Osmani Agent Skills

1 blockers: Metadata review

caution

50/100

Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.

Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.

skills/addy-osmani-agent-skills · trust review · confidence 67%

caution

50/100

Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.

Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.

rules/ai-generated-csrf-protection-review-rules · trust review · confidence 67%

caution

50/100

Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.

Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.

rules/ai-generated-frontend-accessibility-review-rules · trust review · confidence 67%

caution

50/100

Request metadata review from maintainers or internal owners.

Collect package checksum or signed artifact information.

rules/ai-generated-insecure-deserialization-review-rules · trust review · confidence 67%

Decision confidence

Decision confidence scan · balanced

3/40 results are low-confidence and need review before adoption.

high 1medium 36low 3

Addy Osmani Agent Skills

Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.

medium

54/100

Missing: Metadata reviewMissing: Package integrity

skills/addy-osmani-agent-skills · trust review

AI-Generated CSRF Protection Review Rules

Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.

medium

54/100

Missing: Metadata reviewMissing: Package integrity

rules/ai-generated-csrf-protection-review-rules · trust review

AI-Generated Frontend Accessibility Review Rules

Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.

medium

54/100

Missing: Metadata reviewMissing: Package integrity

rules/ai-generated-frontend-accessibility-review-rules · trust review

AI-Generated Insecure Deserialization Review Rules

Address Metadata review, Package integrity before broader rollout.

medium

54/100

Missing: Metadata reviewMissing: Package integrity

rules/ai-generated-insecure-deserialization-review-rules · trust review

Freshness distribution

Mostly fresh with a few aging entries

Median age 54 days; 9 fresh, 3 aging or stale of 12 scanned.

median 54d

Aging

91–180 days

8%

1 entry

Stale

> 180 days

17%

2 entries

Theme distribution

Results center on code-review

100% of this view shares the top theme. Leading themes: code-review, ai-generated-code, security.

Focused

75 distinct themes across 24 scanned

Run Claude Code ultrareview with /code-review ultra for multi-agent cloud review, verified findings, PR mode, and optional claude ultrareview CI subcommand.

Expert code reviewer that provides thorough, constructive feedback on code quality, security, performance, and best practices

Comprehensive code review rules for thorough analysis and constructive feedback

Safety · Privacy ✓

Expert code-review capability pack for deterministic PR audits, risk-ranked findings, and low-noise fix planning without SaaS lock-in.

Level:expertType:capability-packVerified:validated
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓
Cursor logo

Addy Osmani's production-grade Agent Skills pack for AI coding agents, with lifecycle slash commands, engineering workflow skills, review personas, quality gates, and cross-agent setup guidance for Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Antigravity CLI, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and other agents.

Level:expertType:capability-packVerified:validated
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓
OpenCode logo

MIT-licensed skill and plugin framework by Jesse Vincent for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, and other AI coding agents, covering brainstorming, planning, TDD, systematic debugging, subagent-driven development, code review, git worktrees, and finish-the-branch workflows.

Level:expertType:capability-packVerified:validated
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓

Slash command that reviews a pull request diff for security regressions: authentication and authorization gaps, injection surfaces, secret exposure, unsafe deserialization, and dependency risk introduced by the change.

Invocation:/pr-security-review [pr-number]
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓
Roam Code logo
Roam Codeby Cranot · submitted by oktofeesh1

Local codebase intelligence CLI and MCP server that gives Claude a SQLite code graph, change-safety gates, code health checks, impact analysis, review tools, and audit evidence for agent-assisted coding.

Provider Abstraction Layer MCP server for orchestrating multiple AI models, external AI CLIs, planning, consensus, code review, debugging, and delegated sub-agent workflows from one MCP client.

PostToolUse hook that flags two review hazards as Claude writes files: edits to generated or vendored artifacts (lockfiles, minified bundles, source maps, dist/build output, snapshots, protobuf output) and oversized diffs that change more lines than a configurable threshold versus the committed version.

Trigger:PostToolUse
Safety ✓ Privacy ✓
Gitleaks logo
Gitleaksby Gitleaks · submitted by oktofeesh1

Open-source secret scanner for finding passwords, API keys, tokens, and other credentials in git history, files, directories, and stdin.

Semgrep logo
Semgrepby Semgrep · submitted by oktofeesh1

Static analysis platform and open-source CLI for finding bugs, security issues, secrets, dependency risk, and custom rule matches in code.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated endpoints and data-access code before merge for insecure direct object reference risk, covering per-request object-level authorization checks, scoped database lookups, identifier exposure, and consistent enforcement across read, write, and admin operations.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that deserializes data before merge for insecure deserialization risk, covering native serialization formats (pickle, PyYAML, Java Serializable) that can execute arbitrary code on untrusted input, safe data-interchange alternatives, and class allowlisting/integrity checks when native formats can't be avoided.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that binds request parameters to model/entity objects before merge for mass assignment risk, covering allowlist field binding, DTOs that exclude sensitive fields, and the framework-specific autobinding features that make this easy to introduce by default.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated redirect and forward logic before merge for open redirect risk, covering allowlist-based destination validation, relative-path/indexed-mapping alternatives to raw URLs, and the privilege-escalation and phishing impact of an unvalidated redirect target.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that builds or runs operating-system commands, shell invocations, or subprocesses before merge for command injection and argument injection risk, covering library alternatives to shelling out, array-form process APIs, allowlist input validation, and least-privilege execution.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated JavaScript/TypeScript code before merge for prototype pollution risk, covering unsafe recursive merge/clone/assign helpers on untrusted input, proto and constructor-prototype key handling, and safer alternatives like Map, Set, and Object.create(null).

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that renders untrusted data into HTML, JavaScript, URLs, or CSS before merge for cross-site scripting risk, covering context-correct output encoding, dangerous DOM sinks, HTML sanitization, and Content-Security-Policy as defense in depth.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated request handlers and forms before merge for cross-site request forgery risk, covering state-changing method discipline, anti-CSRF token correctness, SameSite cookie posture, origin and referer checks, and safe handling of cookie-based sessions.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated file-handling code for path traversal before merge, covering canonical path validation, safe root confinement, upload filename sanitization, archive extraction limits, and privacy-safe test evidence.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated regular expressions before merge, covering catastrophic backtracking and ReDoS risk, input bounds, anchor and escaping correctness, validation versus parsing, safe engines, and privacy-safe test evidence.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated database access code for SQL injection before merge, covering parameterized queries, identifier handling, ORM safety, dynamic query construction, least-privilege access, and privacy-safe test evidence.

Source-backed rules for reviewing AI-generated code that makes server-side URL or network requests for server-side request forgery before merge, covering URL allow-lists, block-lists for internal networks, redirect handling, response isolation, and privacy-safe test evidence.

Source-backed rules for reviewing event-sourcing implementation changes, covering immutable event design, event schema evolution without breaking projections, idempotent event handlers, snapshot and replay correctness, and consistent event-store access patterns.

Source-backed rules for reviewing feature flag changes across their full lifecycle, covering flag creation, naming, default values, kill switches, targeting, rollout safety, cleanup of stale flags, and privacy-safe configuration evidence.

Source-backed rules for reviewing application logging changes, covering structured machine-readable events, consistent levels, correlation and trace context, actionable messages, log volume and cost, and keeping secrets and personal data out of logs.

Source-backed rules for reviewing test code for test-double misuse, covering over-mocking that decouples tests from real behavior, under-mocking that creates slow or flaky tests, mock-return-value drift, missing contract tests for faked dependencies, and keeping test data free of personal information.

Source-backed rules for reviewing code that calls third-party or remote APIs, covering timeouts, bounded retries with backoff and jitter, idempotency, circuit breaking, rate-limit handling, graceful degradation, and privacy-safe failure logging.

GitHub logo

Set up Claude Code GitHub Actions for pull request review: install the Claude GitHub app, store ANTHROPIC_API_KEY in secrets, pin anthropics/claude-code-action to an audited commit SHA with least-privilege permissions, and follow documented security practices.