Skip to main content
agentsSource-backed

Vale Documentation Maintenance Agent

Source-backed agent for maintaining docs-as-code repositories with Vale prose linting, style rules, vocabulary checks, stale example review, broken source evidence, and contributor-safe documentation updates.

by MkDev11·added 2026-06-05·
Review first review before installing

Open the source and read safety notes before installing.

Citation facts

Source-backed facts for citing this resource, derived directly from the registry — also available as plain text for AI assistants.

Source URLs
https://vale.sh/docs/, https://github.com/vale-cli/vale, https://vale.sh
Safety notes
Vale reports style, spelling, terminology, and prose consistency findings; it does not prove examples, commands, API calls, screenshots, or product claims are correct. Verify stale examples against canonical sources before editing them., Treat automatic fixes, mass formatting, generated snippets, link rewrites, and vocabulary changes as reviewable patches. Inspect diffs before committing because docs changes can alter user-facing product guidance., Do not silence rules, add accepted vocabulary, or lower severity only to make CI pass. Explain the rule, source evidence, and maintainer tradeoff., When examples involve commands, cloud resources, credentials, payments, database writes, deployments, or destructive operations, keep validation dry-run or read-only unless the user explicitly approves execution.
Privacy notes
Documentation examples, screenshots, logs, sample API responses, config snippets, URLs, issue links, and release notes can expose tokens, customer names, internal hostnames, email addresses, account IDs, or unreleased product details., Vale output and documentation review reports may include matched sensitive text. Redact secrets and private identifiers before pasting findings into public issues, pull requests, or model prompts., Prefer synthetic examples and public-safe placeholders unless the repository's source material already contains the exact public example., Keep internal style-guide rationale, private roadmap context, and support incident details out of public documentation comments unless the maintainer has approved publication.
Author
MkDev11
Submitted by
MkDev11
Claim status
unclaimed
Last verified
2026-06-05

Decision playbook

Review trust signals before you adopt

Signals are present but mixed. Use the checklist below to confirm the source and operational safety for your environment.

Compare context
Selected

0

Current score

63

Baseline

Delta

No baseline selected

No major trust-signal divergence detected in the current selection.

Source and provenance checks

Needs review

Confirm ownership and provenance before trusting install instructions.

  • Source link availableRequired

    Open the canonical repository and verify ownership.

    Done
  • Source provenance statusRequired

    Marked as source-backed.

    Done
  • Metadata reviewed

    No reviewed flag detected in metadata.

    Pending

Safety and privacy checks

Complete

Validate risk disclosures before installation or API wiring.

  • Safety notes presentRequired

    Review the listed safety guidance before running commands.

    Done
  • Privacy notes presentRequired

    Review data handling notes before connecting accounts or secrets.

    Done
  • Trust level risk gateRequired

    Trust level does not block evaluation.

    Done

Package and install checks

Needs review

Check package metadata and artifact integrity signals.

  • Install payload available

    Install or copy payload is available for review.

    Done
  • Package verification flag

    No package verification flag provided.

    Pending
  • Checksum metadata

    No checksum provided for downloaded artifact.

    Pending

Compare-driven decision checks

Needs review

Use compare context to validate trade-offs before adoption.

  • Compare tray has multiple entries

    Add at least one more entry to compare trust differences.

    Pending
  • Baseline comparison available

    No baseline peer selected yet.

    Pending
  • Diverging trust signals identified

    No major trust-signal divergence found.

    Pending

Setup at a glance

Copy & paste

Copy-ready — paste the snippet to get started.

Adoption plan

Balanced adoption plan

Current risk score 24/100. Use staged verification before broader rollout.

Risk 24

Pre-adoption checks

Validate source and review signals before any execution.

  • Confirm source provenanceRequired

    Source URL/provenance metadata is present.

    Done
  • Confirm metadata review state

    No review metadata found; increase manual validation.

    Pending
  • Verify install payload

    Install/config payload exists and can be inspected.

    Done

Security checks

Confirm safety, privacy, and package integrity signals.

  • Review safety notesRequired

    Safety notes are present.

    Done
  • Review privacy notesRequired

    Privacy notes are present.

    Done
  • Verify package integrity metadata

    No package verification/checksum metadata.

    Pending

Rollout

Adopt in controlled steps based on the selected plan.

  • Run in isolated sandbox firstRequired

    Use a constrained sandbox and observe behavior across multiple tasks.

    Pending
  • Roll out graduallyRequired

    Roll out to a small cohort before wider usage.

    Pending
  • Set monitoring and fallback

    Define rollback path and monitor errors after adoption.

    Pending

Evidence readiness

Evidence readiness matrix · balanced

Missing required evidence: Metadata review. Risk score 31.

Risk 31

Source provenance

Present

Source repository/provenance is listed.

Required in this preset

Metadata review

Missing

Review metadata is missing.

Required in this preset

Safety notes

Present

Safety notes are present.

Required in this preset

Privacy notes

Present

Privacy notes are present.

Optional in this preset

Package integrity

Missing

Package integrity metadata is missing.

Optional in this preset

Install payload

Present

Install payload is available.

Required in this preset

Required gaps: Metadata review

Decision timeline

Decision timeline · balanced

Blocking gaps: Check metadata review status. Risk 28.

Risk 28

triage

Confirm source provenanceRequired

Source/provenance metadata is available.

Done

triage

Check metadata review statusRequired

Review metadata is missing.

Pending

verify

Review safety notesRequired

Safety notes are available.

Done

verify

Review privacy notes

Privacy notes are available.

Done

verify

Validate package integrity metadata

Package integrity metadata is missing.

Pending

rollout

Verify install payload and commandsRequired

Install payload is available.

Done

Blockers: Check metadata review status

Prerequisite readiness

Prerequisite readiness

4 prerequisites to line up before setup. Includes a review or approval gate.

0/4 ready
Install & runtime1Configuration1Network & hosting1Review & approval1

Safety & privacy surface

Safety & privacy surface

4 safety and 4 privacy notes across 3 risk areas. Review closely: credentials & tokens, network access.

3 areas
  • SafetyNetwork accessVale reports style, spelling, terminology, and prose consistency findings; it does not prove examples, commands, API calls, screenshots, or product claims are correct. Verify stale examples against canonical sources before editing them.
  • SafetyGeneralTreat automatic fixes, mass formatting, generated snippets, link rewrites, and vocabulary changes as reviewable patches. Inspect diffs before committing because docs changes can alter user-facing product guidance.
  • SafetyGeneralDo not silence rules, add accepted vocabulary, or lower severity only to make CI pass. Explain the rule, source evidence, and maintainer tradeoff.
  • SafetyCredentials & tokensWhen examples involve commands, cloud resources, credentials, payments, database writes, deployments, or destructive operations, keep validation dry-run or read-only unless the user explicitly approves execution.
  • PrivacyCredentials & tokensDocumentation examples, screenshots, logs, sample API responses, config snippets, URLs, issue links, and release notes can expose tokens, customer names, internal hostnames, email addresses, account IDs, or unreleased product details.
  • PrivacyCredentials & tokensVale output and documentation review reports may include matched sensitive text. Redact secrets and private identifiers before pasting findings into public issues, pull requests, or model prompts.
  • PrivacyGeneralPrefer synthetic examples and public-safe placeholders unless the repository's source material already contains the exact public example.
  • PrivacyGeneralKeep internal style-guide rationale, private roadmap context, and support incident details out of public documentation comments unless the maintainer has approved publication.

Safety notes

  • Vale reports style, spelling, terminology, and prose consistency findings; it does not prove examples, commands, API calls, screenshots, or product claims are correct. Verify stale examples against canonical sources before editing them.
  • Treat automatic fixes, mass formatting, generated snippets, link rewrites, and vocabulary changes as reviewable patches. Inspect diffs before committing because docs changes can alter user-facing product guidance.
  • Do not silence rules, add accepted vocabulary, or lower severity only to make CI pass. Explain the rule, source evidence, and maintainer tradeoff.
  • When examples involve commands, cloud resources, credentials, payments, database writes, deployments, or destructive operations, keep validation dry-run or read-only unless the user explicitly approves execution.

Privacy notes

  • Documentation examples, screenshots, logs, sample API responses, config snippets, URLs, issue links, and release notes can expose tokens, customer names, internal hostnames, email addresses, account IDs, or unreleased product details.
  • Vale output and documentation review reports may include matched sensitive text. Redact secrets and private identifiers before pasting findings into public issues, pull requests, or model prompts.
  • Prefer synthetic examples and public-safe placeholders unless the repository's source material already contains the exact public example.
  • Keep internal style-guide rationale, private roadmap context, and support incident details out of public documentation comments unless the maintainer has approved publication.

Prerequisites

  • Docs-as-code repository or documentation change set with Markdown, AsciiDoc, reStructuredText, HTML, XML, Org, or another Vale-supported source format.
  • Existing Vale configuration, style packages, vocabulary files, style guide links, and repository documentation contribution rules.
  • Access to canonical product docs, source code, CLI help, API schemas, release notes, package metadata, or changelogs needed to verify examples.
  • Permission scope for the task, such as read-only review, patch proposal, or approved documentation edits.

Schema details

Install type
copy
Troubleshooting
No
Source repository stats
Scope
Source repo
Tool listing metadata
Full copyable content
## Content

Vale Documentation Maintenance Agent is a reusable agent prompt for keeping
docs-as-code repositories current, consistent, and safe to publish. It uses Vale
as the source-backed prose-linting anchor, then layers documentation maintenance
work around stale examples, source evidence, terminology drift, privacy review,
and contributor-safe patch planning.

Use this agent when a documentation pull request needs more than copyediting:
changed commands need source verification, snippets may be stale, screenshots
or logs may expose private details, terminology must match a style guide, and
Vale findings need to be triaged instead of blindly accepted.

## Agent Prompt

You are a Vale documentation maintenance specialist. Use the repository's own
documentation contribution guide, style guide, Vale configuration, vocabulary
files, and canonical product sources first. Use the official Vale documentation
and repository as the source of truth for Vale behavior, styles, rules,
vocabularies, package sync, and prose-linting limits.

Mission:

- Review documentation changes for stale examples, broken source evidence,
  terminology drift, Vale lint findings, and privacy-safe public wording.
- Separate prose/style findings from factual correctness, product behavior,
  release timing, and example validity.
- Produce small, reviewable documentation patches with clear source evidence.
- Avoid hiding legitimate style or vocabulary findings just to pass CI.

Review workflow:

1. Inventory the docs system: source format, build tool, style guide, Vale
   config, style packages, vocabulary files, docs tests, link checks, and
   publishing branch.
2. Read the changed documentation and identify commands, APIs, config fields,
   code snippets, screenshots, diagrams, links, product names, version claims,
   release notes, and generated output.
3. Run or inspect Vale findings when available. Classify each finding as fix,
   false positive, vocabulary candidate, style-guide question, or out-of-scope
   prose preference.
4. Verify stale examples against canonical sources: source code, CLI help,
   OpenAPI or schema files, package metadata, release notes, official docs, or
   tests.
5. Check privacy and publication risk: secrets, real customer data, internal
   hostnames, incident details, private roadmap terms, unreleased features, and
   overly specific account identifiers.
6. Propose the smallest documentation patch that fixes confirmed issues and
   preserves the repository's voice.
7. For rule or vocabulary changes, explain the exact Vale rule, affected docs,
   accepted/rejected terms, source evidence, and expected CI impact.
8. Summarize validation: Vale command or report reviewed, docs build or link
   checks available, source references checked, and any examples left
   unverified.

Output contract:

- Maintenance summary: changed docs, source formats, Vale configuration, and
  validation commands or reports.
- Findings by type: stale example, factual mismatch, style lint, terminology,
  broken link, privacy risk, accessibility/readability, and unresolved question.
- Patch plan: exact files or sections to edit, source evidence, and whether the
  change is prose-only or behavior-sensitive.
- Vale triage: findings to fix, findings to suppress with justification,
  vocabulary updates to propose, and style-guide questions for maintainers.
- Publication decision: approve, approve with caveats, request changes, or block
  publication until source evidence is available.

## Features

- Source-backed Vale prose-lint review for docs-as-code projects.
- Style rule and vocabulary triage instead of automatic rule suppression.
- Stale example review against canonical docs, source code, CLI help, schemas,
  release notes, package metadata, and tests.
- Privacy checks for examples, screenshots, logs, URLs, account identifiers, and
  private roadmap or incident context.
- Contributor-safe output with patch plans, source evidence, validation notes,
  and publication decisions.
- Explicit boundary between prose consistency and factual correctness.

## Use Cases

- Review a documentation pull request that changes commands, configuration, or
  API examples.
- Triage Vale CI failures and decide which findings need prose fixes,
  vocabulary updates, or maintainer review.
- Update stale snippets after a product release without inventing behavior from
  memory.
- Prepare docs patches that keep examples synthetic and public-safe.
- Audit documentation for old links, deprecated product names, and outdated
  screenshots before a release.
- Explain why a proposed Vale rule or vocabulary change should be accepted or
  rejected.

## Source Notes

- The official Vale docs describe Vale as a command-line tool for code-like
  prose linting that is cross-platform, written in Go, and available on GitHub.
- Vale's styles documentation describes styles as collections of YAML rule
  files, with rule headers such as `extends`, `message`, `level`, `scope`,
  `link`, `limit`, and vocabulary behavior.
- Vale's built-in checks include patterns such as existence, substitution,
  occurrence, consistency, capitalization, spelling, and metric-related checks.
- Vale package configuration supports style packages and sync workflows through
  the configured `StylesPath`.
- The `vale-cli/vale` repository describes Vale as a markup-aware prose linter
  built for speed and extensibility and publishes MIT-licensed source.
- The latest GitHub release checked before drafting was `v3.14.2`, published on
  2026-05-15.

## Duplicate Check

Before drafting this entry, the current upstream content tree and PR history
were checked for `Vale`, `vale-cli/vale`, `vale.sh`, `documentation
maintenance`, `stale docs`, `docs lint`, `documentation style guide`, and
related source URLs. No existing content entry or open PR covers Vale or a
Vale-specific documentation maintenance agent.

The existing `documentation-freshness-rules` entry covers source freshness
rules for public AI workflow registry content. This entry is distinct: it is a
reusable `agents` prompt for docs-as-code maintenance using Vale style rules,
vocabularies, stale example review, privacy checks, and source-backed patch
planning.

## Editorial Disclosure

Submitted as an independent community agent entry by `MkDev11`. This listing is
based on Vale's official documentation and repository metadata, with no paid
placement, referral link, or affiliate relationship.

## Sources

- Vale documentation: https://vale.sh/docs/
- Vale styles documentation: https://vale.sh/docs/styles
- Vale package configuration: https://vale.sh/docs/keys/packages
- Vale repository: https://github.com/vale-cli/vale
- Vale latest release checked: https://github.com/vale-cli/vale/releases/tag/v3.14.2

About this resource

Content

Vale Documentation Maintenance Agent is a reusable agent prompt for keeping docs-as-code repositories current, consistent, and safe to publish. It uses Vale as the source-backed prose-linting anchor, then layers documentation maintenance work around stale examples, source evidence, terminology drift, privacy review, and contributor-safe patch planning.

Use this agent when a documentation pull request needs more than copyediting: changed commands need source verification, snippets may be stale, screenshots or logs may expose private details, terminology must match a style guide, and Vale findings need to be triaged instead of blindly accepted.

Agent Prompt

You are a Vale documentation maintenance specialist. Use the repository's own documentation contribution guide, style guide, Vale configuration, vocabulary files, and canonical product sources first. Use the official Vale documentation and repository as the source of truth for Vale behavior, styles, rules, vocabularies, package sync, and prose-linting limits.

Mission:

  • Review documentation changes for stale examples, broken source evidence, terminology drift, Vale lint findings, and privacy-safe public wording.
  • Separate prose/style findings from factual correctness, product behavior, release timing, and example validity.
  • Produce small, reviewable documentation patches with clear source evidence.
  • Avoid hiding legitimate style or vocabulary findings just to pass CI.

Review workflow:

  1. Inventory the docs system: source format, build tool, style guide, Vale config, style packages, vocabulary files, docs tests, link checks, and publishing branch.
  2. Read the changed documentation and identify commands, APIs, config fields, code snippets, screenshots, diagrams, links, product names, version claims, release notes, and generated output.
  3. Run or inspect Vale findings when available. Classify each finding as fix, false positive, vocabulary candidate, style-guide question, or out-of-scope prose preference.
  4. Verify stale examples against canonical sources: source code, CLI help, OpenAPI or schema files, package metadata, release notes, official docs, or tests.
  5. Check privacy and publication risk: secrets, real customer data, internal hostnames, incident details, private roadmap terms, unreleased features, and overly specific account identifiers.
  6. Propose the smallest documentation patch that fixes confirmed issues and preserves the repository's voice.
  7. For rule or vocabulary changes, explain the exact Vale rule, affected docs, accepted/rejected terms, source evidence, and expected CI impact.
  8. Summarize validation: Vale command or report reviewed, docs build or link checks available, source references checked, and any examples left unverified.

Output contract:

  • Maintenance summary: changed docs, source formats, Vale configuration, and validation commands or reports.
  • Findings by type: stale example, factual mismatch, style lint, terminology, broken link, privacy risk, accessibility/readability, and unresolved question.
  • Patch plan: exact files or sections to edit, source evidence, and whether the change is prose-only or behavior-sensitive.
  • Vale triage: findings to fix, findings to suppress with justification, vocabulary updates to propose, and style-guide questions for maintainers.
  • Publication decision: approve, approve with caveats, request changes, or block publication until source evidence is available.

Features

  • Source-backed Vale prose-lint review for docs-as-code projects.
  • Style rule and vocabulary triage instead of automatic rule suppression.
  • Stale example review against canonical docs, source code, CLI help, schemas, release notes, package metadata, and tests.
  • Privacy checks for examples, screenshots, logs, URLs, account identifiers, and private roadmap or incident context.
  • Contributor-safe output with patch plans, source evidence, validation notes, and publication decisions.
  • Explicit boundary between prose consistency and factual correctness.

Use Cases

  • Review a documentation pull request that changes commands, configuration, or API examples.
  • Triage Vale CI failures and decide which findings need prose fixes, vocabulary updates, or maintainer review.
  • Update stale snippets after a product release without inventing behavior from memory.
  • Prepare docs patches that keep examples synthetic and public-safe.
  • Audit documentation for old links, deprecated product names, and outdated screenshots before a release.
  • Explain why a proposed Vale rule or vocabulary change should be accepted or rejected.

Source Notes

  • The official Vale docs describe Vale as a command-line tool for code-like prose linting that is cross-platform, written in Go, and available on GitHub.
  • Vale's styles documentation describes styles as collections of YAML rule files, with rule headers such as extends, message, level, scope, link, limit, and vocabulary behavior.
  • Vale's built-in checks include patterns such as existence, substitution, occurrence, consistency, capitalization, spelling, and metric-related checks.
  • Vale package configuration supports style packages and sync workflows through the configured StylesPath.
  • The vale-cli/vale repository describes Vale as a markup-aware prose linter built for speed and extensibility and publishes MIT-licensed source.
  • The latest GitHub release checked before drafting was v3.14.2, published on 2026-05-15.

Duplicate Check

Before drafting this entry, the current upstream content tree and PR history were checked for Vale, vale-cli/vale, vale.sh, documentation maintenance, stale docs, docs lint, documentation style guide, and related source URLs. No existing content entry or open PR covers Vale or a Vale-specific documentation maintenance agent.

The existing documentation-freshness-rules entry covers source freshness rules for public AI workflow registry content. This entry is distinct: it is a reusable agents prompt for docs-as-code maintenance using Vale style rules, vocabularies, stale example review, privacy checks, and source-backed patch planning.

Editorial Disclosure

Submitted as an independent community agent entry by MkDev11. This listing is based on Vale's official documentation and repository metadata, with no paid placement, referral link, or affiliate relationship.

Sources

Source citations

Add this badge to your README

Show that Vale Documentation Maintenance Agent is listed on HeyClaude. Paste this Markdown into your README — it renders the badge and links back to this page.

Listed on HeyClaude
[![Listed on HeyClaude](https://heyclau.de/badge/agents/vale-documentation-maintenance-agent.svg)](https://heyclau.de/entry/agents/vale-documentation-maintenance-agent)

How it compares

Vale Documentation Maintenance Agent side by side with 3 alternatives on trust, install, platform support, and disclosed safety notes — all from reviewed registry metadata.

1 trust signal differ across this comparison (Submitter).

Field

Source-backed agent for maintaining docs-as-code repositories with Vale prose linting, style rules, vocabulary checks, stale example review, broken source evidence, and contributor-safe documentation updates.

Open dossier

An agent prompt for taking Claude Agent SDK apps to production: choosing the SDK vs CLI vs Managed Agents surface, least-privilege tool and permission scoping, session persistence, cost tracking, OpenTelemetry, and isolated hosting.

Open dossier

Source-backed Claude Code subagent prompt for reviewing Agent Skills before adoption or publication, checking SKILL.md scope, descriptions, invocation control, supporting files, tool permissions, helpfulness, safety, and privacy risks against official Claude Code skills guidance.

Open dossier

An agent prompt for curating an organization's Agent Skills: reviewing each SKILL.md name and description, scope (personal, project, or plugin) and precedence, per-skill allowed-tools, and whether Claude or the user invokes it.

Open dossier
Next steps
Trust
Review statusNot reviewedNot reviewedNot reviewedNot reviewed
Package trustPackage not verifiedPackage not verifiedPackage not verifiedPackage not verified
Source provenanceSource-backedSource-backedSource-backedSource-backed
SubmitterDiffersMkDev11JPette1783Desel72JPette1783
Install riskReview firstReview firstReview firstReview first
Notes Safety ✓ Privacy ✓ Safety ✓ Privacy ✓ Safety ✓ Privacy ✓ Safety ✓ Privacy ✓
Brand
Categoryagentsagentsagentsagents
SourceSource-backedSource-backedSource-backedSource-backed
AuthorMkDev11JPette1783Desel72JPette1783
Added2026-06-052026-06-052026-06-082026-06-05
Platforms
Harness
Source repo
Safety notesVale reports style, spelling, terminology, and prose consistency findings; it does not prove examples, commands, API calls, screenshots, or product claims are correct. Verify stale examples against canonical sources before editing them. Treat automatic fixes, mass formatting, generated snippets, link rewrites, and vocabulary changes as reviewable patches. Inspect diffs before committing because docs changes can alter user-facing product guidance. Do not silence rules, add accepted vocabulary, or lower severity only to make CI pass. Explain the rule, source evidence, and maintainer tradeoff. When examples involve commands, cloud resources, credentials, payments, database writes, deployments, or destructive operations, keep validation dry-run or read-only unless the user explicitly approves execution.This agent advises on architecture; it does not deploy or grant access itself, and a human must approve production changes. Recommend least-privilege tool surfaces and permission modes; avoid bypassPermissions outside isolated environments, and remember subagents inherit a permissive parent mode. Treat untrusted inputs as a prompt-injection risk; recommend isolation, egress controls, and a credential proxy so the agent never sees raw secrets.This agent reviews skill quality and adoption readiness; it does not execute the skill, install plugins, run scripts, or approve production rollout by itself. Flag skills that can perform writes, deployments, destructive actions, account changes, network calls, credential handling, or background automation without explicit user control. Recommend `disable-model-invocation: true`, least-privilege `allowed-tools`, or additional human review when a skill has side effects or could trigger too broadly. Treat supporting files, shell injection blocks, and bundled scripts as executable or instruction-bearing review surfaces, not harmless documentation.This agent curates and reviews skills; it does not execute them. Recommend tool restrictions (allowed-tools) for skills that touch sensitive actions, and invocation control for skills with side effects. Flag skills whose descriptions could cause the model to auto-invoke them in inappropriate contexts.
Privacy notesDocumentation examples, screenshots, logs, sample API responses, config snippets, URLs, issue links, and release notes can expose tokens, customer names, internal hostnames, email addresses, account IDs, or unreleased product details. Vale output and documentation review reports may include matched sensitive text. Redact secrets and private identifiers before pasting findings into public issues, pull requests, or model prompts. Prefer synthetic examples and public-safe placeholders unless the repository's source material already contains the exact public example. Keep internal style-guide rationale, private roadmap context, and support incident details out of public documentation comments unless the maintainer has approved publication.Agent runs send code and context to the configured model provider; confirm the provider and data path are acceptable for the workload. If observability is enabled, content-logging options export prompts and tool data; keep them off unless the pipeline is approved. Session transcripts persist locally or in external storage; recommend retention and access controls appropriate to the data.Reads local skill instructions and supporting files, which may expose internal workflow names, repository paths, policies, examples, customer data, or credentials accidentally written into prompts. Review output can mention sensitive skill names, tool permissions, file paths, dynamic commands, and risk findings; keep it out of public PR comments unless sanitized. Skills loaded by Claude can place their descriptions or full instructions into model context, so the review should flag secrets and unnecessary confidential details before adoption.Skill descriptions load each session; keep sensitive workflow detail and secrets out of them. Skills sourced from outside the org should be reviewed before adoption, since their instructions run in your sessions. Use settings-level overrides to hide or disable model-invocation of skills you did not author without editing their files.
Prerequisites
  • Docs-as-code repository or documentation change set with Markdown, AsciiDoc, reStructuredText, HTML, XML, Org, or another Vale-supported source format.
  • Existing Vale configuration, style packages, vocabulary files, style guide links, and repository documentation contribution rules.
  • Access to canonical product docs, source code, CLI help, API schemas, release notes, package metadata, or changelogs needed to verify examples.
  • Permission scope for the task, such as read-only review, patch proposal, or approved documentation edits.
  • A Claude Agent SDK application or a design for one (Python or TypeScript).
  • Knowledge of the workload: single-shot vs long-running, tools needed, and trust level of inputs.
  • Access to deployment context: provider, hosting target, and observability backend.
  • One or more Agent Skill directories with a `SKILL.md` file and any referenced supporting files.
  • Access to the skill's intended user, task boundary, invocation path, and expected output.
  • A clear policy for whether the skill may be model-invoked automatically or must be user-invoked.
  • Permission to inspect tool restrictions, dynamic context commands, scripts, examples, templates, and bundled plugin metadata if present.
  • A set of Agent Skills (personal, project, or plugin) with their SKILL.md files.
  • Knowledge of which skills should be org-wide versus project-specific.
  • Ability to edit skill frontmatter and settings such as skill overrides.
Install
Config
Citations
ClaimUnclaimedUnclaimedUnclaimedUnclaimed
Open 4 picks in the interactive comparison tool

Related guides

Signals

Loading live community signals…

More like this, weekly

A short, calm digest of reviewed Claude resources. Unsubscribe any time.