Plan Mode & Extended Thinking for Claude Code

The /plan-mode command activates Claude's extended thinking capabilities with progressive depth levels to create comprehensive strategies before jumping into implementation.

Features

• Multi-Level Thinking: Progressive depth from 'think' < 'think hard' < 'think harder' < 'ultrathink'
• 128K Token Output: Extended thinking mode supports up to 128,000 token outputs
• 96.5% Accuracy: Achieves 96.5% accuracy on complex physics and coding problems
• Self-Reflection: Claude evaluates alternatives before committing to solutions
• Architecture Planning: Design system architecture before writing code
• Thought Visibility: View Claude's reasoning process in real-time
• Interrupt Capability: Press ESC to correct path during planning
• Research-First: Forces research and planning before implementation

Usage

/plan-mode [task] [depth]

Depth Levels

• --think - Basic extended thinking (~30s planning)
• --think-hard - Medium depth analysis (~60-90s planning)
• --think-harder - Deep analysis (~2-3min planning)
• --ultrathink - Maximum depth analysis (~5-10min planning)

Planning Scope

• --architecture - System architecture and design
• --implementation - Step-by-step implementation strategy
• --refactor - Refactoring approach and migration path
• --debug - Debugging strategy and root cause analysis
• --research - Research and analysis plan

Options

• --show-thinking - Display Claude's thought process (default: true)
• --no-implement - Plan only, do NOT implement
• --approve-first - Require approval before proceeding to implementation

Examples

Basic Planning (think)

Command:

/plan-mode "Add user authentication" --think --architecture

Claude's Planning:

[Extended Thinking Mode: think]

Analyzing requirements...
- Need secure authentication
- Consider session management
- Evaluate auth methods

Evaluating approaches:
1. JWT tokens (stateless, scalable)
2. Session cookies (stateful, simple)
3. OAuth2 (third-party, complex)

Selected: JWT tokens
Reasoning: Stateless design scales better, mobile-friendly

Architecture Plan:

1. Database Schema:
   - users table (id, email, password_hash, created_at)
   - refresh_tokens table (user_id, token, expires_at)

2. API Endpoints:
   POST /api/auth/register
   POST /api/auth/login
   POST /api/auth/refresh
   POST /api/auth/logout

3. Middleware:
   - Authentication middleware (verify JWT)
   - Rate limiting (prevent brute force)

4. Security:
   - bcrypt for password hashing (cost: 12)
   - JWT expiry: 15min access, 7d refresh
   - HTTPS only

Ready to implement? (y/n)

Deep Planning (think harder)

Command:

/plan-mode "Migrate from REST to GraphQL" --think-harder --refactor

Claude's Deep Analysis:

[Extended Thinking Mode: think harder]

Analyzing current state...
- 45 REST endpoints across 8 resources
- Mixed response formats (some paginated, some not)
- Over-fetching in 12 endpoints
- Under-fetching requiring 3+ requests in 8 workflows

Evaluating migration strategies:

1. Big Bang Migration:
   Pros: Clean break, no dual maintenance
   Cons: High risk, long freeze
   Risk: HIGH

2. Gradual Migration (selected):
   Pros: Low risk, incremental value
   Cons: Dual maintenance period
   Risk: LOW

3. Parallel Systems:
   Pros: Safe rollback
   Cons: Infrastructure cost
   Risk: MEDIUM

Selected: Gradual Migration
Reasoning: Minimize risk, maintain velocity

Migration Plan (8-week timeline):

Week 1-2: Foundation
- Install Apollo Server
- Design GraphQL schema
- Setup type generation
- Create resolver boilerplate

Week 3-4: Core Resources (Priority: High)
- Migrate User queries/mutations
- Migrate Post queries/mutations
- Add DataLoader for N+1 prevention
- Write integration tests

Week 5-6: Secondary Resources
- Migrate Comments
- Migrate Tags
- Migrate Categories
- Performance benchmarking

Week 7: Optimization
- Query complexity limiting
- Persisted queries
- APQ (Automatic Persisted Queries)
- Caching strategy

Week 8: Cutover
- Feature flag rollout (10% → 50% → 100%)
- Monitor error rates
- Deprecate REST endpoints
- Documentation update

Dependencies:
- GraphQL code generator
- Apollo Server 4.x
- DataLoader
- GraphQL Tools

Risks & Mitigation:
1. Schema design issues
   → Weekly schema reviews
2. Performance regressions
   → Load testing before each phase
3. Breaking changes for clients
   → Maintain REST parallel for 3 months

Success Metrics:
- Reduce API calls by 40%
- Improve response times by 25%
- Client satisfaction > 8/10

Ready to proceed with Week 1-2? (y/n)

Maximum Depth (ultrathink)

Command:

/plan-mode "Design scalable microservices architecture" --ultrathink --architecture

Claude's Comprehensive Analysis:

[Extended Thinking Mode: ultrathink]
[This may take 5-10 minutes for thorough analysis]

Phase 1: Requirements Analysis

Current System:
- Monolithic architecture (250K LOC)
- PostgreSQL database (2TB)
- Peak load: 10K req/s
- Team: 20 developers
- Deployment: Weekly releases

Pain Points:
- Deployment requires full system downtime
- Database bottleneck at peak load
- Slow feature velocity (conflicting changes)
- Scaling inefficient (must scale entire monolith)

Goals:
- Zero-downtime deployments
- Independent service scaling
- Faster feature delivery
- Improved fault isolation

Phase 2: Service Decomposition Strategy

Boundary Identification:

1. User Service
   - Domain: Identity, authentication
   - Data: 5M users, 100MB
   - Load: 2K req/s
   - Team: 3 developers

2. Product Service
   - Domain: Catalog, inventory
   - Data: 1M products, 50GB
   - Load: 5K req/s
   - Team: 5 developers

3. Order Service
   - Domain: Transactions, fulfillment
   - Data: 10M orders, 500GB
   - Load: 1K req/s
   - Team: 4 developers

4. Payment Service
   - Domain: Transactions, invoice records
   - Data: 8M transactions, 200GB
   - Load: 800 req/s
   - Team: 3 developers

5. Notification Service
   - Domain: Email, SMS, push
   - Data: Events only
   - Load: 3K req/s
   - Team: 2 developers

Phase 3: Technology Stack

```yaml
Services:
  user-service:
    runtime: Node.js (Fast user queries)
    database: PostgreSQL (ACID for users)
    cache: Redis (Session storage)

  product-service:
    runtime: Node.js (Heavy read workload)
    database: PostgreSQL (Primary)
    cache: Redis (Product catalog)
    search: Elasticsearch (Full-text search)

  order-service:
    runtime: Node.js (Transaction handling)
    database: PostgreSQL (Strong consistency)
    message-queue: RabbitMQ (Order processing)

  payment-service:
    runtime: Node.js (PCI compliance)
    database: PostgreSQL (Financial data)
    encryption: At-rest and in-transit

  notification-service:
    runtime: Node.js (I/O heavy)
    queue: RabbitMQ (Async delivery)
    providers: SendGrid, Twilio, FCM

Phase 4: Communication Patterns

Synchronous (REST/GraphQL):

• User → Product (Browse catalog)
• Order → Payment (Process transaction)

Asynchronous (Event-Driven):

• Order Created → Notification (Send confirmation)
• Payment Success → Order (Update status)
• Product Updated → Search (Index update)

Phase 5: Data Management

Database Per Service:

• User Service: users DB
• Product Service: products DB
• Order Service: orders DB
• Payment Service: payments DB

Shared Data Access Patterns:

1. API calls (preferred)
2. Event sourcing (eventual consistency)
3. CQRS (read replicas)

Phase 6: Migration Strategy (12 months)

Quarter 1: Foundation

• Week 1-4: Setup Kubernetes cluster
• Week 5-8: Implement edge routing layer
• Week 9-12: Extract User Service (lowest risk)

Quarter 2: Core Services

• Week 13-18: Extract Product Service
• Week 19-24: Extract Order Service

Quarter 3: Financial Systems

• Week 25-32: Extract Payment Service (highest risk)
• Week 33-36: Audit and compliance

Quarter 4: Supporting Services

• Week 37-42: Extract Notification Service
• Week 43-48: Decommission monolith
• Week 49-52: Optimization and monitoring

Phase 7: Infrastructure

Kubernetes:
  nodes: 20 (auto-scaling 10-50)
  namespaces: dev, staging, production

Service Mesh (Istio):
  - Traffic management
  - Circuit breaking
  - Mutual TLS
  - Observability

Monitoring:
  - Prometheus (metrics)
  - Grafana (dashboards)
  - Jaeger (distributed tracing)
  - ELK Stack (logging)

CI/CD:
  - GitHub Actions
  - ArgoCD (GitOps)
  - Canary deployments

Phase 8: Risk Assessment

High Risk:

1. Data consistency during migration Mitigation: Dual-write pattern, verify before cutover
2. Service discovery failures Mitigation: Health checks, circuit breakers
3. Distributed transaction complexity Mitigation: Saga pattern, compensating transactions

Medium Risk:

1. Team skill gaps Mitigation: Training program, pair programming
2. Infrastructure costs increase Mitigation: Right-sizing, spot instances

Low Risk:

1. Monitoring gaps Mitigation: Observability-first design

Phase 9: Success Metrics

Technical:

• Deployment frequency: 1/week → 10/day
• Lead time: 2 weeks → 2 days
• MTTR: 4 hours → 30 minutes
• Service uptime: 99.5% → 99.95%

Business:

• Feature velocity: +200%
• Cost per transaction: -30%
• Customer satisfaction: +15%

Phase 10: Go/No-Go Decision

Recommendation: PROCEED

Reasoning:

• Clear business case (velocity + uptime)
• Manageable risk with mitigation plan
• Team buy-in confirmed
• Budget approved

Next Steps:

1. Form migration team (5 engineers)
2. Setup Kubernetes cluster (Week 1)
3. Begin User Service extraction (Week 5)

Estimated Total Cost: $450K (infrastructure + developer time) ROI Timeline: 18 months

Approve architecture plan? (y/n)

## Thinking Levels Comparison

| Level | Time | Depth | Use Case |
|-------|------|-------|----------|
| think | 30s | Surface analysis | Quick decisions, simple tasks |
| think hard | 60-90s | Multiple alternatives | Feature planning, moderate complexity |
| think harder | 2-3min | Deep analysis, risks | Refactoring, architecture changes |
| ultrathink | 5-10min | Comprehensive strategy | System design, migrations |

## When to Use Each Level

### --think (Quick Planning)
- Adding a new API endpoint
- Fixing a known bug
- Writing a simple feature
- Code refactoring (small scope)

### --think-hard (Moderate Planning)
- Designing a new feature
- Database schema changes
- Integration with third-party service
- Performance optimization

### --think-harder (Deep Planning)
- Large refactoring projects
- Migration strategies
- Architecture improvements
- Complex debugging

### --ultrathink (Maximum Planning)
- Microservices architecture
- System-wide migrations
- Technology stack changes
- Multi-month projects

## Best Practices

1. **Plan Before Code**: Use `/plan-mode` before implementing complex features
2. **Interrupt When Needed**: Press ESC if Claude's plan goes off track
3. **Approve Before Proceeding**: Use `--approve-first` for critical changes
4. **Match Depth to Complexity**: Don't use ultrathink for simple tasks
5. **Review Alternatives**: Extended thinking evaluates multiple approaches
6. **Document Plans**: Plans serve as architecture documentation
7. **Iterate on Feedback**: Refine plan based on team input

## Integration with Other Commands

### Plan → TDD Workflow
```bash
/plan-mode "Add payment processing" --think-hard --no-implement
# Review plan
/tdd-workflow "Implement payment processing per plan" --unit

Plan → Subagents

/plan-mode "Refactor auth system" --think-harder --no-implement
# Review plan
/subagent-create --architect --code-reviewer --test-engineer
# Implement with specialist subagents

Plan → Checkpoints

/plan-mode "Database migration" --ultrathink
# Create checkpoint before proceeding
# Implement migration
# Rewind if issues arise

• Source repositorygithub.com 2026-07-13T15:19:32-07:00
• Documentationcode.claude.com