Prefer reading a precomputed report; scanning dependencies during every statusline refresh can be slow., Auto-scan mode refuses symlinked report paths and writes through a temporary file before replacing the report., Vulnerability counts need human triage for reachability, exploitability, and acceptable remediation timing., Do not let a zero count replace lockfile review, provenance checks, or package-manager audit policy.
Privacy notes
OSV reports can reveal package names, versions, ecosystems, and repository structure., The statusline prints only the count, but the local JSON report may contain detailed dependency metadata., If scans run against private package manifests, review where the scanner sends package coordinates.
Author
MkDev11
Submitted by
MkDev11
Claim status
unclaimed
Last verified
2026-06-04
Decision playbook
Review trust signals before you adopt
Signals are present but mixed. Use the checklist below to confirm the source and operational safety for your environment.
Compare context
Selected
0
Current score
78
Baseline
—
Delta
No baseline selected
No major trust-signal divergence detected in the current selection.
Source and provenance checks
Complete
Confirm ownership and provenance before trusting install instructions.
Source link availableRequired
Open the canonical repository and verify ownership.
Done
Source provenance statusRequired
Marked as source-backed.
Done
Metadata reviewed
Registry metadata indicates a reviewed listing.
Done
Safety and privacy checks
Complete
Validate risk disclosures before installation or API wiring.
Safety notes presentRequired
Review the listed safety guidance before running commands.
Done
Privacy notes presentRequired
Review data handling notes before connecting accounts or secrets.
Done
Trust level risk gateRequired
Trust level does not block evaluation.
Done
Package and install checks
Needs review
Check package metadata and artifact integrity signals.
Install payload available
Install or copy payload is available for review.
Done
Package verification flag
No package verification flag provided.
Pending
Checksum metadata
No checksum provided for downloaded artifact.
Pending
Compare-driven decision checks
Needs review
Use compare context to validate trade-offs before adoption.
Compare tray has multiple entries
Add at least one more entry to compare trust differences.
OSV-Scanner documentation describes scanning dependency manifests and emitting JSON output for automation.
This statusline reads a report by default so teams can run scans on their own cadence and keep Claude Code refreshes fast.
Duplicate check
Checked existing statuslines, live HeyClaude statuslines, open pull requests, and repository content for osv-dependency-risk-statusline, OSV-Scanner, dependency risk, vulnerability count, and dependency statuslines. No statusline entry or open PR with this slug or OSV source was found.
Disclosure
Editorial statusline recipe. No paid placement or affiliate link is used.
Show that OSV Dependency Risk Statusline is listed on HeyClaude. Paste this Markdown into your README — it renders the badge and links back to this page.
[](https://heyclau.de/entry/statuslines/osv-dependency-risk-statusline)
How it compares
OSV Dependency Risk Statusline side by side with 3 alternatives on trust, install, platform support, and disclosed safety notes — all from reviewed registry metadata.
1 trust signal differ across this comparison (Submitter).
Next steps differ across entries — use the actions in the table below to copy install commands and source links per resource.
Claude Code statusline that summarizes MCP server count, remote endpoint count, and credential-surface hints without printing tokens, secrets, local paths, or full endpoint URLs.
✓Prefer reading a precomputed report; scanning dependencies during every statusline refresh can be slow.
Auto-scan mode refuses symlinked report paths and writes through a temporary file before replacing the report.
Vulnerability counts need human triage for reachability, exploitability, and acceptable remediation timing.
Do not let a zero count replace lockfile review, provenance checks, or package-manager audit policy.
✓The default mode does not scan file contents; it only counts sensitive-looking environment files in Git status.
Enable recursive git-secrets scanning only in repositories where you are authorized to inspect all files.
Scanner mode invokes the git-secrets executable directly and does not fall back to Git aliases.
Treat any scan warning as a stop-and-review signal before committing, sharing logs, or opening a PR.
✓Queue counts help with triage but do not rank urgency, security impact, or release blockers.
Draft PRs are excluded from the ready count, but repositories may use labels or checks for additional readiness rules.
Keep the refresh interval moderate to avoid repeated GitHub search calls.
✓This statusline is advisory and should not be used as the only MCP authorization review.
It intentionally avoids printing full URLs, local paths, header names, tokens, or environment variable values.
Remote endpoints and credential hints should trigger a separate review of protected resource metadata, scopes, and token handling.
Privacy notes
✓OSV reports can reveal package names, versions, ecosystems, and repository structure.
The statusline prints only the count, but the local JSON report may contain detailed dependency metadata.
If scans run against private package manifests, review where the scanner sends package coordinates.
✓The default output prints counts only and does not print filenames or matched values.
Recursive scans read repository files and may inspect sensitive local material.
Terminal recordings can still reveal that a workspace contains sensitive environment files.
✓The script prints aggregate counts only, not PR titles, authors, or branch names.
Private review requests follow the local GitHub account and may reveal workload size in screenshots.
Organization review-team rules may cause counts to differ from the GitHub web UI.
✓The statusline reads Claude Code session metadata from stdin and prints only counts plus a generic credential hint.
Avoid modifying the script to print full server URLs, headers, tokens, local config paths, or account identifiers on shared screens.
Prerequisites
OSV-Scanner JSON report at `osv-report.json`, or OSV_STATUSLINE_JSON set to another report path.
jq available for reading the report.
Optional OSV-Scanner CLI installed if OSV_STATUSLINE_SCAN is set to 1.
Git installed and the command run from a repository worktree.
Optional git-secrets installed if GIT_SECRETS_STATUSLINE_SCAN is set to 1.
A slower refresh interval when optional scanning is enabled, because recursive scans can be expensive.
GitHub CLI installed and logged in as the maintainer account whose review queue should be shown.
jq available for counting pull request fields.
Repository access that lets GitHub search return pull requests requesting the current account's review.
Claude Code CLI with statusline support.
jq installed locally.
MCP server metadata available in the Claude Code statusline input.